Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Enterprise Resource Planning & Manufacturing
Lawson S3 Procurement
Limiting Requestors to one company
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Zac Shields
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5210
People Online:
Visitors:
156
Members:
0
Total:
156
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
S3 Customization/Development
Read and Write CSV file COBOL
10/9/2024 2:53 PM
Does anyone have a quik example of a program that
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Enterprise Resource Planning & Manufacturing
Lawson S3 Procurement
Limiting Requestors to one company
Please
login
to post a reply.
5 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
1 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Display Name
Basic Member
Posts: 17
9/7/2012 4:34 PM
We added a second company to AP, GL, PO, IC, RQ. In adding the second company to RQ, requestors can now select accounting unit/accounts for both companies. How are people limiting requestors to a single company. Is there a way in RQ or do we use the GL system restrictions?
John Henley
Posts: 3353
9/7/2012 5:02 PM
I typically do this by combining accounting units on RQ04 with security rules against GLNAMES; it does fall apart when you have additional companies, since you then have to leave the company field blank on RQ04. With multiple companies, it's a problem writing rules if your accounting units have same number/key across multiple companies. I don't think there is a good solution.
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1163
9/10/2012 7:07 PM
At least for RQC you can modify the rqc_config.xml file to
For those who can access RQ10 would need the security rules. Maybe you could create a rule that only allows a specific value in the company field in RQ10?
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1163
9/10/2012 7:10 PM
Not sure why my entire message was not posted but here is the setting for the rqc_config.xml file
setting id="allow_company_select" value="true"
JonA
Veteran Member
Posts: 1163
9/10/2012 7:11 PM
sorry. that should be
setting id="allow_company_select" value="false"
Display Name
Basic Member
Posts: 17
9/12/2012 1:08 PM
Thanks.
We found an existing enhancement request that has been elevated to development so should have a resolution in the next iteration.
They didn't want to open up RQ10 again.
We're adding our intercompany transfer accounting unit (which doesn't allow ordering) from the new company to old requestors' profile and old company's I/C AU to the new company's requestors to accomodate the 'security by exception' rules in RQC.
Now if only the RQ204 report would show all instead of last modified...
Please
login
to post a reply.