Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Manager Self-Service - Personnel Actions
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Zac Shields
Past 24 Hours:
1
Prev. 24 Hours:
1
Overall:
5210
People Online:
Visitors:
299
Members:
0
Total:
299
Online Now:
New Topics
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Lawson S3 Procurement
RQ13 Approval Info
10/17/2024 2:12 PM
When a Requisition is approved on RQ13, what table
S3 Customization/Development
Read and Write CSV file COBOL
10/9/2024 2:53 PM
Does anyone have a quik example of a program that
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Human Capital Management
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Manager Self-Service - Personnel Actions
Please
login
to post a reply.
3 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
68 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
dtracey
Basic Member
Posts: 10
4/4/2011 12:36 PM
We have been developing the MSS-Personnel Actions task without customization, including related ProcessFlows. In doing so, we encountered two major system issues; 1) if we left the PA52 Change function available for MSS-inbasket view, a manager could make changes to the original action at any time while the action was going through the approval process within the process flow, 2)the PA52 Add functionality allows the submitting manager to add new actions via the inbasket view. Our intent was NOT to allow changes or additions via the inbasket view.
Lawson is proposing we purchase their customization solution. Looking for feedback from other clients who are currently using the MSS-Personnel Actions task. Did you customize? If so, has the process been working successfully? What issues have you encountered?
Is there anyone who is using this feature and DID NOT customize? How did you get past the two obstacles noted above?
Shane Jones
Veteran Member
Posts: 460
4/4/2011 1:04 PM
I am sorta "typing" from the hip.... But what if you just changed security in lsa to be add only for pa52?
dtracey
Basic Member
Posts: 10
4/4/2011 2:52 PM
We did remove the Change function. But it still leaves the issue of the Add button. If we remove the Add functionality, then managers will not be able to add personnel actions via MSS.
Roger French
Veteran Member
Posts: 549
4/4/2011 3:46 PM
You really can't prevent managers from either changing or adding PA's in inbasket *without* doing some type of customization.
If you tried securing the PA52's for Adds and Changes, you would run into the issue of Adding a PA52.
So,...
If you really don't want approvers changing or adding a PA in the inbasket, you could create a custom PA52 form using Design Studio, and remove the add/change/delete buttons.
[quote]
Posted By dtracey on 04/04/2011 08:36 AM
We have been developing the MSS-Personnel Actions task without customization, including related ProcessFlows. In doing so, we encountered two major system issues; 1) if we left the PA52 Change function available for MSS-inbasket view, a manager could make changes to the original action at any time while the action was going through the approval process within the process flow, 2)the PA52 Add functionality allows the submitting manager to add new actions via the inbasket view. Our intent was NOT to allow changes or additions via the inbasket view.
Lawson is proposing we purchase their customization solution. Looking for feedback from other clients who are currently using the MSS-Personnel Actions task. Did you customize? If so, has the process been working successfully? What issues have you encountered?
Is there anyone who is using this feature and DID NOT customize? How did you get past the two obstacles noted above?
[/quote]
Please
login
to post a reply.