Login
Register
Search
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Forums
Supply Chain Management
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Question - Cost Messages
Home
Forums
Jobs
LawsonGuru
LawsonGuru Letter
LawsonGuru Blog
Worthwhile Reading
Infor Lawson News Feed
Store
Store FAQs
About
Who's On?
Membership:
Latest:
Saef
Past 24 Hours:
0
Prev. 24 Hours:
0
Overall:
5226
People Online:
Visitors:
150
Members:
0
Total:
150
Online Now:
New Topics
User Group Announcements
Carolina User Group Meeting
12/20/2024 3:15 PM
Date & Time: February 6, 2025, 8:30am - 4:00pm
S3 Systems Administration
ADFS certificate - new cert
12/3/2024 9:38 PM
The certificates on the windows boxes expired and
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Post Tax Benefit Plan Table
11/14/2024 9:16 PM
Hi, totally new to Laswon. I have a repor
Lawson S3 Procurement
ED501 Error: Map 850 not supported by /law/c15vda/lawson/test10/edi/bin/laws_out_91
11/12/2024 3:47 PM
Tried runnning ED501 and getting the atathced erro
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Error
11/6/2024 9:54 PM
When I try to enroll a retiree in 72.1 health plan
Infor ERP (Syteline)
Syteline: New Data Maintenance Wizard (Error) Need help
11/1/2024 4:24 PM
Hi, I need help with an error on syteline while us
Dealing with Lawson / Infor
Implementing Lawson v10 with Cerner Surginet, Case Cart Picking, and Quick Adds for the OR
10/29/2024 4:20 PM
Hi Everyone, I am wondering if there is any org
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
Canada Tax Calculation (Federal and Provincial) Issue
10/23/2024 5:00 AM
Initially, we had problem with CPP2 calculation is
Lawson S3 HR/Payroll/Benefits
CA Section 125 401k Plan
10/22/2024 10:13 PM
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to fac
S3 Systems Administration
Running AC120 deleted records from ACMASTER table
10/22/2024 3:40 PM
We recently ran the AC120 as normal and somehow it
Top Forum Posters
Name
Points
Greg Moeller
4184
David Williams
3349
JonA
3291
Kat V
2984
Woozy
1973
Jimmy Chiu
1883
Kwane McNeal
1437
Ragu Raghavan
1372
Roger French
1315
mark.cook
1244
Forums
Filtered Topics
Unanswered
Unresolved
Announcements
Active Topics
Most Liked
Most Replies
Search Forums
Search
Advanced Search
Topics
Posts
Prev
Next
Forums
Supply Chain Management
Lawson S3 Supply Chain
Question - Cost Messages
Please
login
to post a reply.
3 Replies
0
Subscribed to this topic
38 Subscribed to this forum
Sort:
Oldest First
Most Recent First
Author
Messages
Bev Edwards
Veteran Member
Posts: 366
5/20/2014 2:16 PM
Is it possible to place a $$$ limit on answering cost messages?
David Williams
Veteran Member
Posts: 1127
5/20/2014 3:39 PM
You could add edit checks and limits using Design Studio.
Stephanie
Veteran Member
Posts: 86
5/20/2014 4:06 PM
Are you refering to the MA64/M66.3 Messages? The tollerances are set up in the MA00.9 form.
Mike Bernhard
Veteran Member
Posts: 101
5/20/2014 4:10 PM
Hi Bev -
1) You can adjust tolerances on the PO Cost Message Tab of the each match rule
2) Alternatively, you could turn off PO COST MESSAGES altogether.
Here are some thoughts about this, if you are curious in my line of thinking:
PO Cost Messages are optional invoice messaging that allow a buyers message to be created upon invoice entry – even before receipts have been entered and without any additional action required by Accounts Payable. The benefits of PO Cost messages are the timeliness with which the information is available to the Purchasing Department. The idea behind PO COST MESSAGES is based on the theory that "the earlier cost mismatches between the vendors and your organization can be identified and resolved the less likely they are to perpetuate on future transactions."
The downside to PO Cost messages is that they do not offer a short pay (or Pay PO Price) option and guiding an invoice to that resolution will continue to require the use of Recon Cost Messages currently in place. This essentially creates two touch points for this path/outcome.
When deciding whether or not an organization should use PO Cost Messages, the answer to this directly correlates to the percentage of discrepancies in which the organization is paying the vendor (or invoiced) price. A quick analysis (last 6 months) will reveal the frequency of how often your organization agrees to pay the invoiced price. Using this historical data, you will be able to identify whether there are appears to be an efficiency opportunity in leveraging PO COST MESSAGES versus turning it off altogether. (if you agree to pay the vendor price more than 50% of the time, then PO COST MESSAGES are a good idea).
Hope this helps
Please
login
to post a reply.